Forums  

Go Back   Forums > ISM Discussion Area > General Supply Management Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2013, 01:41 PM
pledger1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cost Savings Analysis

Just curious as to what savings calculators your company utilizes? I know they are several different formulas that are generally accepted, I'm just looking for real examples of what you are currently using.

We are currently using a average of bids. Which means we are combining all of the bids to get an average and then subtracting the low bid from that. It seems like an odd way to calculate savings, but that's what we doing currently.

Example:
Bid 1 = $100
Bid 2 = $150
Bid 3 = $125
Avg = $125 minus low bid (100) savings = $25

Any other suggestions?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2013, 06:40 AM
daynagirl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi there, it is good but you can also start at a lower bid. Anyway, do you have savings? having a large chunk of cash in savings is always the very best thing to do so you can pay for any emergency situations that come your way. While you are working on building that money up, you may have emergencies still. Many people do not have the cash flow to put too much cash away anyway. When you have a crisis and need cash, you can use a pay day loan.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2013, 10:49 PM
shannonaverett
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink Cost Savings Calculations

There are various ways that you can calculate cost savings. You have to first determine if it is a hard, soft, or 3-bid cost savings. The only cost savings that impact your financial statements is the hard cost savings. Hard cost savings is only relevant if you have historical pricing data.

Shannon




Quote:
Originally Posted by pledger1 View Post
Just curious as to what savings calculators your company utilizes? I know they are several different formulas that are generally accepted, I'm just looking for real examples of what you are currently using.

We are currently using a average of bids. Which means we are combining all of the bids to get an average and then subtracting the low bid from that. It seems like an odd way to calculate savings, but that's what we doing currently.

Example:
Bid 1 = $100
Bid 2 = $150
Bid 3 = $125
Avg = $125 minus low bid (100) savings = $25

Any other suggestions?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2013, 07:11 PM
blund
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cost Savings

We consider cost savings if the savings are negotiated off of a proposed price.
In the past I have also utilized historical pricing, but this doesn't take into consideration market changes and could impact your true cost savings.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2013, 07:42 PM
ahrani82
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I imposed the same logic to our cost savings calculation.

Cost saving = average of Evaluated bid prices - Resulting Contract Price

Evaluated bid prices = adjusted bid price after clarifications, negotiations and risk assessment
Resulting Contract Price = negotiated final value with the recommended bidder.

It is based on the simple logic that bids are a reflection of market price for goods/services. This would not apply to fuel or vehicles or other commodities or services that published unit rates are readily available.
So, if the bids prices viewed as market prices, then the average of bid prices are deemed as the market price.

However, if commodity you are buying has a set market rate, such as MSRP for vehicle, than I would calculate cost savings from MSRP since without tendering or negotiations, that is the set price for the goods.

Hope I have clarified how I perceive cost savings in supply chain as deductions obtained from tendering process.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.