Author(s):
Dr. Phillip L. Carter
Dr. Phillip L. Carter, Professor of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, 517/432-3521.
Dan D. Siadak
Dan D. Siadak, CFC, President, RBF, Inc., Lansing, MI 48906, 517/323-3181.
Brian P. Behnken
Brian P. Behnken, Purchasing Manager, Blue Care Network - Southwest, Southfield, MI. 48086, 313/799-6610.
Systems
ABSTRACT.
This paper presents an approach to creating a competitive
advantage through a supplier-customer partnership to reengineer the paper
based information system in an organization. The competitive advantage is
created by reducing costs, enhancing process quality and increasing
productivity. The nature of the partnership and the organizational changes
needed to implement it are described. The paper briefly reviews the concepts
of business process reengineering (BPR) and demonstrates how the redesign of
the paper based information system can be integrated with BPR activities. The
paper describes a methodology for redesigning paper based information systems
based on a detailed analysis of the business processes. Lastly, the
experiences of an organization which redesigned its paper based information
system in partnership with a supplier are presented. Some results of this
effort, including cost and time savings and quality improvements, are
presented.
SUPPLIER-CUSTOMER PARTNERSHIP.
Business forms are the foundation and
most visible part of the paper based information system in an organization.
Traditionally, organizations acquired business forms using a bidding process.
Little thought was given to how the business forms were actually used, what
impact they had on the organization or its customers, or how the business
forms might be improved. Typically this approach resulted in poorly designed
forms which caused frequent errors and omissions in the information flow,
which, in turn, led to high rates of rework and scrap. Additionally, this
approach led to frequent form stockouts, which disrupted business, excessive
form inventories, and high form obsolescence and scrap. Some organizations
even designed and produced the forms in-house, using ad-hoc groups to design
new forms as the need arose and producing the forms on a copy machine. The
in-house approach often yielded even more dismal results.
In contrast to using the bidding process, some progressive purchasing departments completely outsourced their business forms, relying on suppliers to manage this aspect of the business. Long term relationships were established which required the supplier to be responsible for designing effective and user friendly forms and for managing the forms inventory to minimize stockouts, inventory, and obsolescence. Several suppliers of business forms now offer these services under the general name of business forms management . Generally this approach to business forms management has yielded good results, including a reduction in the acquisition cost of business forms.
Recently, a few business forms suppliers and customers have moved to elevate their relationship to a partnership which includes a broader and deeper level of activity between the partners. This new relationship integrates the business forms supplier into the Business Process Reengineering (BPR) activities of the customer. The customer motivation to create this new relationship is the realization that all business processes are accompanied by an information system. Therefore, to accomplish the best possible redesign of a business process, redesign of the accompanying information system is also necessary. Because business process information systems (BPIS) typically include both paper based and electronic based elements, progressive business forms suppliers have developed the capability to analyze and redesign both. Thus, the BPR activities of the organization are formally expanded to include a reengineering of the BPIS. We call this Business Process Information System Reengineering (BPISR). (Figure 1 displays the concept of BPR and BPISR).
Establishing this partnership requires a new approach by both the supplier and the customer. Both need to take an organization-wide point of view and involve functions in addition to purchasing in creating the partnership. Often presidents and vice presidents have to be sold on the idea of a sole supplier for business forms and on the involvement of the supplier in the business process reengineering activities of the organization. The supplier vision must be one of supplying BPIS expertise, not just business forms. Both parties have to make a long term commitment to the partnership to achieve the maximum benefits.
BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING.
As computers and software were
introduced into organizations, the result, in most cases, was to automate
processes then in place. Cumbersome or ineffective processes were speeded up,
but the effect on overall organizational efficiency and effectiveness was
small. Thus, management found itself in the position of investing large sums
in computers, software, networks, and other computer technology, with precious
little return on the investment. [1] In an effort to energize this investment
companies have engaged in reengineering the basic processes in the
organization. The reengineered processes made better use of the investment in
computers and related technology, eliminated many middle management positions,
and often resulted in more efficient and effective organizations.
Many authors and practitioners have presented approaches to business process reengineering. In Table I the first column lists the BPR activities suggested in [2]. In the second column the authors identify the concomitant activities required to reengineer the business process information system.
TABLE I INTEGRATING BPR AND BPIS ACTIVITIES
PHASE I ORGANIZING FOR IMPROVEMENT
BPR ACTIVITIES BPISR ACTIVITIES
1. Establish Executive Improvement Establish partnership with BPIS
Team (EIT ) supplier
2. Appoint a BPI (Business Process Include redesign of BPIS in charge to
Improvement) Champion BPI Champion
3. Provide executive training BPIS partner provides training on
BPIS
4. Develop an improvement model Include BPIS in improvement model
5. Communicate goals to employees Include BPIS in goals
6. Review business strategy and Review impact of BPIS on strategy and
customer requirements customers
7. Select the critical processes Include BPIS in process definition
8. Appoint process owners Make process owners aware of BPIS
partner
9. Select the Process Improvement Team Include BPIS partner on Process
Improvement Team
PHASE II UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS BPR ACTIVITIES BPISR ACTIVITIES 1. Define the process scope and Identify associated information mission system 2. Define process boundaries Identify information inputs, information produced and used within the process, and information output from the process 3. Provide team training BPIS partner provides training on BPIS 4. Develop a process overview Include role of BPIS in overview 5. Define customer and business Evaluate client technology measurements and expectations capability, infrastructure, and for the process development capability 6. Flow diagram the process Include BPIS in the process flow diagram or prepare parallel diagrams to illustrate complex systems 7. Collect cost, time, and value data Collect usage information for each document (paper based or electronic) 8. Perform process walkthroughs Include BPIS flow 9. Resolve differences Resolve differences 10. Update process documentation Include BPIS in update
PHASE III STREAMLINING
BPR ACTIVITIES BPIS ACTIVITIES
1. Provide team training BPIS partner provides training on
BPIS
2. Identify improvement opportunities: Identify improvement opportunities:
* eliminate bureaucracy * fitness for use analysis
* eliminate no-value-activities * combine and eliminate documents
* simplify the process * meet corporate design standards
* reduce process time * improve public image
* error proof the process * eliminate errors and omission
* upgrade equipment
* standardize
* automate
3. Document the process Include instructions, flow charts and
job aids in redesigned paper based
information system. Provide
on-line help in electronic
information systems
4. Select the employees Select the employees
5. Train the employees Include BPIS in training
PHASE IV MEASUREMENTS AND CONTROL
BPR ACTIVITIES BPIS ACTIVITIES
1. Develop in-process measurements and Incorporate quality and performance
targets measurement into documents and
electronic information system
2. Establish a feedback system Develop reporting schedule, inventory
control procedures, process
improvement reports and service
evaluation
3. Audit the process periodically Audit the information system
periodically
4. Establish a poor-quality cost Establish a poor-quality cost for
system documents and screens which
includes the cost of reduced
productivity, product cost, and
rework
PHASE V CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT BPR ACTIVITIES BPIS ACTIVITIES 1.Qualify the process Qualify the BPIS 2.Perform periodic qualification Challenge each document which is part process of the BPIS as it is restocked 3. Define and eliminate process Define and eliminate BPIS problems problems 4. Evaluate the change impact on the Evaluate the change impact of the business and on customers BPIS on the business and on customers 5. Benchmark the process Document improved quality, increased productivity, and reduced cycle time 6. Provide advanced team training BPIS partner provides training
BUSINESS PROCESS INFORMATION SYSTEM REENGINEERING.
Business process
information system reengineering takes place under the umbrella of BPR. In
Phase II of BPR, Understanding the Process, information gathering takes a
separate but parallel path. Samples of each document, data entry/retrieval
screen, and report associated with the business process are collected and
evaluated. The initial evaluation is performed without client input,
examining the documents and screens for:
The current information flow is flowcharted to illustrate gaps, hold points, and duplicate information routing.
Detailed interviews with document and screen owners or principal users follow the initial analysis where objective information is collected (i.e., usage rates, handling, routing and storage information) as well as subjective review of the communication tools' suitability (i.e., adequate fill-in space, correct information, fitness for use, recurring errors).
Close coordination of the BPR activities and BPISR activities are required in Phase III, Streamlining. Otherwise, the information system could be streamlined to support a process that no longer exists. To avoid working at cross purposes, the BPIS streamlining should lag behind the BP streamlining. Thus reengineered processes can be taken into account when streamlining BPIS. In fact, the BPIS streamlining can be key to implementing the re-engineered processes.
Using the reengineered business process as a map, information elements required to support the business process are identified. This perfect future world is compared to the existing BPIS and process flow. Documents and data entry screens are combined, eliminated and redesigned to meet the requirements of the new process. Another important area of evaluation is the interaction between electronic and paper-based information systems. Use of bar coding, scanning, or simply rezoning printed information for more efficient data entry can improve productivity and increase accuracy significantly.
Following the BPISR, proposed revisions are presented to the users and management for critique, testing and approval. Once approval is given, implementation schedules must be developed and the new BPIS implemented.
CASE STUDY.
In August 1993, Blue Care Network of Southeast Michigan and
RBF Inc. began their partnership. The agreement is based on RBF, Inc.
supplying all of the business printing at Blue Care Network in return for
performing BPISR as well as evaluating and redesigning individual documents as
they are ordered. The RBF, Inc. account manager chairs the BCN Forms
Committee and directs their activities which include review and approval of
each document implemented and coordination with the Information Systems
Department.
RESULTS.
In the first year business processes in four departments were
analyzed. (The structure of the company lends itself to organizing the
process analyses around departments.)
The BPISR resulted in the following changes and improvements:
Additionally, the following productivity improvements were documented:
Hours Saved per Year Department Change
52 Stockroom Direct deliveries and reduced
stock
572 Purchasing Eliminate bidding and
purchasing printing
520 Corporate
Communications Designing and specifying
forms
750 Information Services Revised microfilm input sheet
650 Members Services Revised forms
5000 Membership and Billing Revised enrollment/change
form
7544 Total Savings
SUMMARY.
BPR can only be effectively accomplished if the BPIS is also
reengineered. This can be accomplished by partnering with a knowledgeable
supplier and making the supplier part of the BPR team. Experience from case
studies has show that partnering can lead to significant cost reduction,
quality improvement, and productivity increases. These improvements, in turn,
can lead to a significant competitive advantage for the organization.
REFERENCES