--- To enhance the value and performance of procurement and SCM practitioners and their organizations worldwide ---

Journal of Supply Chain Management

Article Abstracts

Vol. 45, No. 1
Winter 2009

  • Triads in Supply Networks: Theorizing Buyer-Supplier-Supplier Relationships

    Past studies in supply chain management have focused on dyadic relationships (e.g., buyer-supplier), as all relationships in a network begin with a dyad. However, dyads do not capture the essence of a network. We posit in this paper that triads are the fundamental building blocks of a network. To begin considering triads in supply networks, we build on two extant bodies of literature — the buyer-supplier relationship and supplier-supplier relationship literature which offer us the context of buyer-supplier-supplier triads. By doing so, we are taking the first step toward cracking the internal dynamics of triads in supply networks. To build theoretical propositions, we apply balance theory and the structural-hole concept. We identify nine triadic archetypes of buyer-supplier-supplier relationships and state key propositions that aid in decision making in supply networks.
    Thomas Y. Choi, Ph.D., is the John G. Bebbling Professor in Business at Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona and
    Zhaohui Wu, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor in the College of Business at Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

  • Using Confidence Intervals in Supply Chain and Operations Research (invited paper)

    Like research throughout the entire business discipline, supply chain management research has relied almost exclusively on hypothesis testing methods. This is unfortunate as hypothesis tests routinely are misinterpreted in scientific research. We explain the limitations of hypothesis testing and recommend the use of confidence intervals as the preferred inferential statistical method. In particular, the additional information provided by confidence interval methods in highlighted using several supply chain management examples. We conclude with a set of recommendations designed to enhance the quality of supply chain management research.
    Douglas G. Bonett, Ph.D., is Professor of Statistics and Psychology at Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa and
    Thomas A. Wright, Ph.D., is the Jon Wefald Leadership Chair and Professor of Organizational Behavior at Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.

  • Special Topic Forum on Modeling Versus Empiricism

    The essays that make up this Special Topic Forum include:

    • Introduction to the Special Topic Forum
      Craig R. Carter, Ph.D., is Professor of Supply Chain Management at the University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada.

    • The Modeling-Empiricism Gap: Lessons from the Qualitative-Quantitative Gap in Consumer Research (invited comment)
      Russell W. Belk, Ph.D., is the Kraft Foods Canada Chair of Marketing at the Schulich School of Business at York University in Toronto, Ontario (Canada).

    • The Empiricism-Modeling Dichotomy in Operations and Supply Chain Management(invited comment)
      Kevin J. Dooley, Ph.D., is Professor of Supply Chain Management in the W. P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.

    • Issues in the Modeling-Empiricism Gap (invited comment)
      Jack R. Meredith, Ph.D., is Professor of Management and Broyhill Distinguished Scholar/Chair in Operations at Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

    • Bridging the Gap Between Methodological Camps in Supply Chain Management (invited comment)
      Nada R. Sanders, Ph.D., is the James L. and Eunice West Chair in Supply Chain Management in the Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas.

    Edited by Craig R. Carter.